SVT monitor vs. TRIGMON etc.
SVT monitor does not run from CDF DAQ data stream
- there are good reasons for this
- it is done this way and can not be changed
- event lost by SVT will not be in DAQ stream
- need to monitor L1 triggers that fail L2
Will need our own little DAQ
Still can try to make it look like standard DAQ
- special AC++ input module
- L1 data collected into events and analyzed by standard AC++ consumer
- use standard CDF tools for histograms, message passing, remote connections
Can stick to standard approach with (SVTMON?) code running off CDF DAQ stream.